Poll: Majority say protecting speech more important than curbing divisive language
A large majority of Americans say protecting free speech rights is more important than restricting divisive speech, according to a new survey.
The poll from Napolitan News Service asked 1,000 registered voters: “Is it more important to protect free speech or to prevent people from using overheated language?” Sixty-five percent said protecting speech is more important, while 24% responded that protecting people from divisive language is more important; 12% said they were unsure.
The same poll asked: “While it is always difficult to wish ill of another human being, is America better off now that Charlie Kirk has been killed?” While 67% responded no, 15% said yes and 18% were unsure.
Authorities are seeking the death penalty for the man charged with assassinating Kirk, something 55% of voters agree with if he is convicted, according to the poll; 37% said the alleged shooter should not face the death penalty while 22% were unsure.
The survey was conducted by pollster Scott Rasmussen’s RMG Research Sept. 12-13 and has a margin of sampling error of +/- 3.1 percentage points.
Latest News Stories
Du Quoin State Fair gets $50M as senator defends two state fairs in Illinois
WATCH: Pritzker alleges Trump election interference; tells disgruntled residents to move
Illinois quick hits: Foreign national indicted for fraud; Chicago Public Schools budget approved
CA Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to stop redistricting
Lawsuit links CA teen’s suicide to artificial intelligence
Your Ultimate Guide to the 2025 Frankfort Fall Fest: Everything to Know for the Nationally-Ranked Event
HHS, Department of Education announce nutrition reforms
White House appoints interim CDC director; standoff continues with former director
WATCH: Pritzker claims Trump plans election interference with troop deployment
Plaintiffs take Cook County gun ban challenge to SCOTUS
Illinois quick hits: $1.57B return on investments; solar-powered manufacturer cuts ribbon
Report: Illinois U.S. Rep faces minimal penalty after disclosure violations