
Frankfort Park District in Dispute with Five Oaks HOA Over Park Development Rules
The Frankfort Park District is taking legal steps to untangle itself from the development rules of the Five Oaks homeowners association, asserting that as a public body, it “cannot be dictated by the HOA” on how a park parcel within the subdivision is developed.
The issue came to light during the park board’s June 10, 2025, meeting, where Executive Director Gina Hassett informed commissioners that a proposed settlement agreement with the HOA was not yet ready for a vote. She revealed that the district’s attorneys are actively working on a solution to a foundational conflict: the park district’s land is currently included in the HOA’s governing declaration, which could subject public park development to private association rules.
According to Hassett, the district is pursuing a path to have the Five Oaks HOA remove the park district property from its declaration entirely. A key part of the strategy is to achieve this “without paying to have it removed,” putting the onus on the association to amend its own governing documents.
The core of the dispute centers on the autonomy of a public government entity versus a private one. Park districts typically follow their own master plans, public input, and board directives when developing parks and facilities. Being bound by an HOA’s covenants could potentially restrict the types of amenities, building materials, or even the timeline for developing the park land, which is intended for public use.
During the meeting, a discussion was held among the board members and staff, but no formal action was taken as the matter remains in the hands of legal counsel. The outcome of the negotiations could have broader implications for how the park district interacts with other HOAs where public park land is situated within a private residential development.
The board expressed its support for the staff’s direction, signaling a unified front in protecting the district’s authority over its own property and ensuring that future development is guided by public interest rather than private covenants. Further updates are expected as the settlement negotiations progress.
Latest News Stories

Judge expands restraining order against ‘Beto’ O’Rourke, adds ActBlue

Reversing Biden’s precedent, students complete FAFSA in minutes at beta-testing event

Trump, Zelenskyy to meet Monday in steps toward peace with Russia

Possible ‘agreement’ reached in Trump-Putin meeting; more discussion likely

WATCH: Gun rights supporters celebrate 9th Circuit’s ruling against CA gun rationing law

Feds sue California over emission standards for trucks

Illinois quick hits: ‘Lawsuit inferno’ bill takes effect after Pritzker signed 267 measures Friday

WATCH: UW-authored study on surgery times contradicts CMS basis for reimbursement cuts

State defends gun ban district court ruled unconstitutional

Trump aiming for ceasefire, world awaiting news from Putin summit

Pritzker acts upon 269 bills, vetoes 2, signs ‘lawsuit inferno’ measure

Report: average American to receive $3,752 tax cut in 2026 due to OBBBA
