Frankfort Park District in Dispute with Five Oaks HOA Over Park Development Rules
The Frankfort Park District is taking legal steps to untangle itself from the development rules of the Five Oaks homeowners association, asserting that as a public body, it “cannot be dictated by the HOA” on how a park parcel within the subdivision is developed.
The issue came to light during the park board’s June 10, 2025, meeting, where Executive Director Gina Hassett informed commissioners that a proposed settlement agreement with the HOA was not yet ready for a vote. She revealed that the district’s attorneys are actively working on a solution to a foundational conflict: the park district’s land is currently included in the HOA’s governing declaration, which could subject public park development to private association rules.
According to Hassett, the district is pursuing a path to have the Five Oaks HOA remove the park district property from its declaration entirely. A key part of the strategy is to achieve this “without paying to have it removed,” putting the onus on the association to amend its own governing documents.
The core of the dispute centers on the autonomy of a public government entity versus a private one. Park districts typically follow their own master plans, public input, and board directives when developing parks and facilities. Being bound by an HOA’s covenants could potentially restrict the types of amenities, building materials, or even the timeline for developing the park land, which is intended for public use.
During the meeting, a discussion was held among the board members and staff, but no formal action was taken as the matter remains in the hands of legal counsel. The outcome of the negotiations could have broader implications for how the park district interacts with other HOAs where public park land is situated within a private residential development.
The board expressed its support for the staff’s direction, signaling a unified front in protecting the district’s authority over its own property and ensuring that future development is guided by public interest rather than private covenants. Further updates are expected as the settlement negotiations progress.
Latest News Stories
WATCH: Pritzker tells Trump ‘come and get me;’ SCOTUS hears ballot counting case
Peotone School Board Rejects New Assistant Athletic Supervisor Positions Amid Budget Woes
WATCH: Trump admin singles out Chicago, Pritzker during Antifa roundtable
Peotone School Board Rejects Budget Amid Financial Crisis, Scrambles for Cuts
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Peotone Board of Education Committee for September 22, 2025
Illinois quick hits: Trump deploys Illinois Nartional Guard; Madigan to report to prison
Trump deploys California National Guard to Portland
Peace on the line two years after Oct. 7 attacks
U.S. Supreme Court looks to start consequential new term
U of I scrutinized over perceived preference for international students
District Launches ‘Peotone PRIDE’ Engagement Meetings to Boost Community Communication
Youngkin, Johnsion calll for AG candidate to withdraw after violent texts emerge