Joliet Unity Movement Criticizes Board’s Handling of Cannabis Tax Revenue
Will County Board Meeting | December 4, 2025
Article Summary: During public comment, the Joliet Unity Movement denounced a recent board vote that redirected cannabis tax revenue away from community reinvestment programs. Board Member Julie Berkowicz later echoed calls for greater transparency regarding how those funds are allocated.
Cannabis Funding Dispute Key Points:
-
Public Protest: Amy Sanchez of the Joliet Unity Movement argued that “R3” (Restore, Reinvest, and Renew) funds should target communities harmed by the war on drugs, not internal county equipment.
-
Transparency Concerns: Board Member Julie Berkowicz criticized the current two-person committee structure for dispensing cannabis and opioid settlement funds.
-
Call for Oversight: Berkowicz requested these funds be managed through the Finance Committee with full board and public oversight.
JOLIET, Ill. — The Will County Board faced criticism on Thursday, December 4, 2025, regarding its November decision to redirect cannabis tax revenue into the general county budget rather than specific community reinvestment programs.
Amy Sanchez, representing the Joliet Unity Movement, spoke during public comment to denounce the board’s November 20 vote. She argued the decision violated the spirit of Illinois’ “R3” framework—Restore, Reinvest, and Renew—which is intended to support neighborhoods disproportionately impacted by historical drug policies.
“Funds were rerouted to department equipment and internal expenses… that already have an operating budget,” Sanchez said. “We call for an immediate action for the county board to reconsider the amendment.”
Sanchez criticized the board for “shutting down debate” on the item during the previous meeting.
Later in the meeting, Board Member Julie Berkowicz (R-Naperville) addressed the issue, expressing concern over the lack of transparency in how cannabis and opioid settlement funds are handled. Currently, decisions are made by a small committee.
“They meet or they don’t meet. There’s no set schedule. There’s no recording of the meeting,” Berkowicz said.
Berkowicz challenged Speaker Joe VanDuyne to restructure the process in the new year, requesting that these funds be brought before the Finance Committee where all 22 board members and the public can participate. “By the time this two-person committee brings their list forward, they’ve already determined who’s going to get this money,” she said.
Latest News Stories
Trump calls out Minnesota in State of the Union, prompting Democrat protests
Parents could gain access to school discipline evidence under proposed bill
State of the Union highlighted political fracture between Democrats, Trump
Illinois Democrats dispute Trump statements during State of the Union
Illinois Quick Hits: State taxpayers to help restore historic Chicago hotel
Trump moves ahead with tariff plans after Supreme Court ruling
Illinois racial wealth gap among largest in country
Judge: Right to sue under IL biometrics law too important to end suit vs Meta
Executive Committee: Tension Rises as Republican Whip Removed from Panel
Commission Overrides Staff Recommendation, Approves Manhattan Township Barn Expansion
Chicago could owe $100M+ in refunds for excessive city tickets