Attorneys file request to Supreme Court over gender secrecy
The Thomas More Society has filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting intervention in the Mirabelli v. Bonta lawsuit over gender secrecy policies in California schools.
Before the emergency application request, the U.S. Court for Appeals for the 9th Circuit granted California’s motion to pause the permanent injunction, stating that there was no clear evidence that the policies prevent parents from obtaining information about their children.
“California parents’ religious and fundamental parental rights — and the health and safety of their children — are too precious for them to delay seeking relief from this Court,” the emergency request stated.
The request also highlighted that the Parental Exclusion Policies directly interfere with the rights of all class member parents to direct their children’s upbringing, education, and medical treatment, as well as all plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.
In December, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez certified a class action lawsuit in Mirabelli v. Bonta. A few weeks later, the 9th Circuit granted California’s emergency motion for a freeze, temporarily suspending a class-wide permanent injunction against the state’s gender secrecy policies in public schools.
“The Constitution does not allow the state to replace parents or conscript teachers into deception,” Paul M. Jonna, Special Counsel for Thomas More Society and Partner at LiMandri & Jonna LLP, said. “The Supreme Court must act now.”
In addition to the Thomas More Society attorneys’ emergency request to the U.S. Supreme Court, they have also filed a request for en banc reconsideration of the 9th Circuit’s freeze order. “En banc” means an 11-judge panel from the 9th Circuit would hear the case instead of a typical three-judge panel.
The case began in April 2023, when two Escondido teachers sued the Escondido Unified School District in San Diego County, the California Department of Education and Attorney General Rob Bonta after being denied a religious accommodation from school policies. These gender policies required staff to use students’ preferred pronouns and, upon request, withhold information about a child’s gender identity from parents. Parents later joined the suit.
Latest News Stories
WATCH: State police prepares ICE protest zones; energy policy debate continues
DHS blames ‘sanctuary’ politicians for ICE violence
Illinois news in brief: Department of Transportation reviews CTA spending plans; Illinois manufacturers kick off ‘Makers on the Move’ tour; Hearings continue on energy legislation
Peotone Schools to Tackle $372,000 in Unpaid Fees with New Plan
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Will County Board for September 18, 2025
Illinois quick hits: Transit cliff revision criticized; Pike County shooting investigation
Pritzker open to spending on Bears infrastructure, concerns remain about debt
IL legislators weigh energy policy some say will increase costs
Analyst points to inefficiencies as Pritzker touts record spending on infrastructure
Illinois quick hits: DHS announces more than 800 illegals arrested; utility prices drop slightly
WATCH: Officials shift shutdown blame; agreed-bill process upended; GOP offers solutions
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Lincoln-Way Community High School District 210 Board of Education for September 18, 2025
States sue feds over denying grants for illegal immigrants
Pritzker blames Trump for partial government shutdown