Attorneys file request to Supreme Court over gender secrecy
The Thomas More Society has filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting intervention in the Mirabelli v. Bonta lawsuit over gender secrecy policies in California schools.
Before the emergency application request, the U.S. Court for Appeals for the 9th Circuit granted California’s motion to pause the permanent injunction, stating that there was no clear evidence that the policies prevent parents from obtaining information about their children.
“California parents’ religious and fundamental parental rights — and the health and safety of their children — are too precious for them to delay seeking relief from this Court,” the emergency request stated.
The request also highlighted that the Parental Exclusion Policies directly interfere with the rights of all class member parents to direct their children’s upbringing, education, and medical treatment, as well as all plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.
In December, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez certified a class action lawsuit in Mirabelli v. Bonta. A few weeks later, the 9th Circuit granted California’s emergency motion for a freeze, temporarily suspending a class-wide permanent injunction against the state’s gender secrecy policies in public schools.
“The Constitution does not allow the state to replace parents or conscript teachers into deception,” Paul M. Jonna, Special Counsel for Thomas More Society and Partner at LiMandri & Jonna LLP, said. “The Supreme Court must act now.”
In addition to the Thomas More Society attorneys’ emergency request to the U.S. Supreme Court, they have also filed a request for en banc reconsideration of the 9th Circuit’s freeze order. “En banc” means an 11-judge panel from the 9th Circuit would hear the case instead of a typical three-judge panel.
The case began in April 2023, when two Escondido teachers sued the Escondido Unified School District in San Diego County, the California Department of Education and Attorney General Rob Bonta after being denied a religious accommodation from school policies. These gender policies required staff to use students’ preferred pronouns and, upon request, withhold information about a child’s gender identity from parents. Parents later joined the suit.
Latest News Stories
Public Works Committee: Approves $1.59 Million Contract for Scheer Road Bridge Replacement in Green Garden Township
Will County Board Backs $10 Million State Public Health Grant Increase Amid Funding Cuts
Barn Fire on Whispering Hills Lane Claims Livestock, Draws Extensive Mutual Aid Response
Will County Public Works Committee Shelves License Plate Reader Agreement Amid Bipartisan Privacy Concerns
Will County Planning and Zoning Commission Overrides Staff to Approve New Lenox Accessory Building Variance
Will County Sheriff’s Office Welcomes Remi, First Electronic Scent Detection Dog
Will County Transportation Department Announces Open House for Manhattan-Monee Road Expansion
Will County Community Mental Health Board Faces $5 Million Shortfall in 2026 Grant Requests
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Public Health & Safety Committee for March 5, 2026
Will County Officials Warn of Zoom Court Scam Targeting Defendants for Fraudulent Dismissal Fees
Will Land Use Committee Evaluates Multi-Million Dollar Buyout for Flooded Harris Drive Homes
Behavioral Health Division Drops Wait Times, Reports Zero Opioid Deaths in February
Harris Drive Residents Plead for County Intervention Amid Failing Septic Systems and Flooding
Will County Sheriff’s Office Investigates Fatal Hit-and-Run in Homer Glen