Attorneys file request to Supreme Court over gender secrecy
The Thomas More Society has filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting intervention in the Mirabelli v. Bonta lawsuit over gender secrecy policies in California schools.
Before the emergency application request, the U.S. Court for Appeals for the 9th Circuit granted California’s motion to pause the permanent injunction, stating that there was no clear evidence that the policies prevent parents from obtaining information about their children.
“California parents’ religious and fundamental parental rights — and the health and safety of their children — are too precious for them to delay seeking relief from this Court,” the emergency request stated.
The request also highlighted that the Parental Exclusion Policies directly interfere with the rights of all class member parents to direct their children’s upbringing, education, and medical treatment, as well as all plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.
In December, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez certified a class action lawsuit in Mirabelli v. Bonta. A few weeks later, the 9th Circuit granted California’s emergency motion for a freeze, temporarily suspending a class-wide permanent injunction against the state’s gender secrecy policies in public schools.
“The Constitution does not allow the state to replace parents or conscript teachers into deception,” Paul M. Jonna, Special Counsel for Thomas More Society and Partner at LiMandri & Jonna LLP, said. “The Supreme Court must act now.”
In addition to the Thomas More Society attorneys’ emergency request to the U.S. Supreme Court, they have also filed a request for en banc reconsideration of the 9th Circuit’s freeze order. “En banc” means an 11-judge panel from the 9th Circuit would hear the case instead of a typical three-judge panel.
The case began in April 2023, when two Escondido teachers sued the Escondido Unified School District in San Diego County, the California Department of Education and Attorney General Rob Bonta after being denied a religious accommodation from school policies. These gender policies required staff to use students’ preferred pronouns and, upon request, withhold information about a child’s gender identity from parents. Parents later joined the suit.
Latest News Stories
Watershed Committee Vows Litigation if County Approves Massive Earthrise Solar Project
Capital Imp Committee: Facilities Director Reports on VAC Progress and Critical Health Department Elevator Repairs
‘Good Food For All’ Initiative Proposes Local Agricultural Asset Mapping for Will County
Public Works Committee Advances $3.2 Million Engineering Contract for Mills Road Reconstruction
Board Members Debate “Commitment to Truth” in Media Resolution
Executive Committee: Speaker VanDuyne and Member Butler Clash Over Removal of Committee Chair
Finance Committee: County Appropriates Fees from $25 Million Wilmington Warehouse Project
Everyday Economics: A stalled labor market and why the next data points matter
Assaults against ICE up 1300%, vehicular attacks up 3200%, death threats up 8000%
Bipartisan bill to cap annual deficits at 3% could curb debt growth
One year in, a ‘ho-hum’ jobs report
Five battleground governor’s races for 2026
Chicago Flips Red calls for audit after public schools report