Attorneys file request to Supreme Court over gender secrecy
The Thomas More Society has filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting intervention in the Mirabelli v. Bonta lawsuit over gender secrecy policies in California schools.
Before the emergency application request, the U.S. Court for Appeals for the 9th Circuit granted California’s motion to pause the permanent injunction, stating that there was no clear evidence that the policies prevent parents from obtaining information about their children.
“California parents’ religious and fundamental parental rights — and the health and safety of their children — are too precious for them to delay seeking relief from this Court,” the emergency request stated.
The request also highlighted that the Parental Exclusion Policies directly interfere with the rights of all class member parents to direct their children’s upbringing, education, and medical treatment, as well as all plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights.
In December, U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez certified a class action lawsuit in Mirabelli v. Bonta. A few weeks later, the 9th Circuit granted California’s emergency motion for a freeze, temporarily suspending a class-wide permanent injunction against the state’s gender secrecy policies in public schools.
“The Constitution does not allow the state to replace parents or conscript teachers into deception,” Paul M. Jonna, Special Counsel for Thomas More Society and Partner at LiMandri & Jonna LLP, said. “The Supreme Court must act now.”
In addition to the Thomas More Society attorneys’ emergency request to the U.S. Supreme Court, they have also filed a request for en banc reconsideration of the 9th Circuit’s freeze order. “En banc” means an 11-judge panel from the 9th Circuit would hear the case instead of a typical three-judge panel.
The case began in April 2023, when two Escondido teachers sued the Escondido Unified School District in San Diego County, the California Department of Education and Attorney General Rob Bonta after being denied a religious accommodation from school policies. These gender policies required staff to use students’ preferred pronouns and, upon request, withhold information about a child’s gender identity from parents. Parents later joined the suit.
Latest News Stories
District Weighs $4.8 Million Debt Reduction Scenarios as Facility Issues Persist
County Expands Paratransit Services, Board Members Question Long-Term Funding
California attorney general joins coalition to protect trans youth in sports
Supreme Court blocks National Guard deployment to Chicago
Chicago mayor refuses to sign or veto budget at ‘not a campaign event’
Illinois quick hits: DOJ sues over sanctuary expansion law
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Joliet Junior College Board for Dec. 10, 2025
District 210 Awards $24.4 Million Contract for Major HVAC Upgrades
IL Medicaid overhaul effective Jan. 1 sparks backlash
Illinois quick hits: Man convicted of drug money laundering; human trafficking arrests made
Mental Health Board Updates Committee on 2026 Grant Cycle and Funding Priorities
Peotone Board Welcomes New Trustee, Receives Top Recognition in Annual Audit