Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Malibu continues to rebuild one year after Palisades Fire
‘Promises kept’: American energy dominance has advanced in Trump’s first year
Illinois millionaire’s tax would direct 50% of revenue to public schools
Group seeks clarity on local IL governments using tax dollars for polling
Illinois congressmen call for accountability after fatal Minneapolis shooting
Kavanagh: Mayes must resign, her comments endanger ICE
Riots continue in Twin Cities
Former GOP lawmaker urges regulators to block potential Netflix-Warner Bros. merger
U.S. withdrawal from WHO completed over COVID-19 mishandling
Judge ends anti-ICE case, jumps into IL Dems’ bid to freeze ICE
U.S. Supreme Court to define decades-old consumer law
WATCH: Candidate investigates Medicaid spending; Diversity program audit urged