Hundreds of Uber drivers demand union-permitting bill move in Springfield
(The Center Square) – Nearly 400 drivers for platforms like Uber and Lyft appeared at the Illinois Capitol, where they urged lawmakers to move forward with Senate Bill 2906, which would give collective bargaining rights to many of the independent contractor drivers.
Aside from the unionization, the current Senate version would also impose a new fee of 4 cents per trip, which would go to a Rideshare Workers Support Fund, and could be increased based on the Consumer Price Index each calendar year.
Sponsor of the bill, state Sen. Ram Villivalam, D-Chicago, characterized the bill as one that would result in better working conditions, wages and increased job benefits.
“We would like the corporations that are making, I think, $43 billion dollars in profit to do the right thing. But because they won’t on their own, we’re going to make them,” Villivalam said.
The Illinois Labor Relations Board, however, has pushed back. In March, Director Kimberly Stevens told a House committee that their chamber’s version of the bill presents a conflict of interest in the per-ride fee.
Stevens said the conflict is that the board would be managing funds for unions it also regulate.
She told lawmakers her agency doesn’t collect fees and would not be able to provide information or data about employers to the union, as it isn’t within their purview.
The amended Senate version attempts to correct the conflict by allowing the board to contract a third-party organization for the services.
Sen. Robert Peters, D-Chicago, spoke of affordability in the state, and issues drivers face, including sometimes suspending driver accounts over unfounded claims.
“It is our time and our moment to get what we need. So, we’re going to get a union in the state and we won’t take no for an answer,” Peters said.
Ronnie Gonzalez, a representative with the International Association of Machinists Union, explained why the group feels it needs the ability to bargain with the companies, even though they are not traditional employees.
“While these advancements and technologies have been enjoyed by the passengers, the workers are left behind by federal and state labor laws that do not recognize their changing in work environment,” Gonzalez said.
Gonzalez previously told The Center Square that stakeholders concerned with the per-ride fee over cost to riders are unfounded, and if they required the companies to instead pay into the fund, there would be less transparency for consumers.
The bill has been continuously postponed in the Labor Committee since mid-April, with no hearing scheduled.
Latest News Stories
Trump, Vance among 100,000 expected at Kirk memorial service
Report: Visa programs are over crowded, lower wages
Poll: Majority say protecting speech more important than curbing divisive language
Illinois’ gun ban set for oral arguments in appeals court Monday
Law professor explains why Trump could win tariff case
JJC Board Approves Student Trustee Quorum Policy Amid Heated Debate
WATCH: Los Angeles schools superintendent renews contract
Last prosecution witness testifies in Routh trial
Southern California Edison works on paying Eaton Fire victims
U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly presents ‘AI for America’ roadmap
Education groups propose alternative standards for math and science
WATCH: Education department launches America 250 effort