Social media platforms challenge Chicago tax; Pritzker confident in statewide plan
(The Center Square) – Chicago faces an ongoing lawsuit over a tax ordinance on social media platforms that was imposed four months ago, but city officials said this week they have confidence in its legality.
The measure has also already brought in revenue far beyond expectations.
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and the city council have both discussed the above-expected revenues generated by the City’s Social Media Amusement and Responsibility Tax this week.
Johnson announced Tuesday the tax is now projected to bring in $49.2 million, rather than the previous $31 million expected to be brought in during 2026.
“By making sure that we pass innovative progressive revenue streams, like the first of its kind Social Media Amusement Responsibility Tax or the smart tax. We can fund critical services like our mental health clinics and our crisis response teams,” Johnson said.
The tax is imposed, according to statute, on social media platforms with more than 100,000 users, at a rate of 50 cents per user after the minimum threshold.
The millions of dollars in revenue has yet to be counted toward the city’s budget however. The stated reason is because the measure is being challenged in court, according to city officials.
Deputy Corporation Counsel with the Chicago Department of Law Susan Jordan said the lawsuit is in an early stage.
“Nothing has happened thus far and we are defending it,” Jordan said.
Jung Yoon, policy chief for the mayor, added that the mayor’s office isn’t too worried about the merits of the case.
“We did look in the research phase drafting this to be very mindful of those limitations and we do believe we have strong defensible arguments,” Yoon said.
A similar policy that passed through the Illinois General Assembly in May seeks to tax the platforms statewide.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker defended the measure’s inclusion toward the projected tax base in the coming year’s budget to members of the media Tuesday.
“I have been, over the many years, not counting revenue that we don’t know that we’re going to get,” Pritzker said. “We in fact didn’t include things like the digital ad tax and things like that because we’re a little unsure about what could result from there.”
NetChoice, a trade group representing industry giants like Meta and X, filed a lawsuit against Chicago in March on the grounds that the city isn’t allowed to place an amusement tax on the companies.
A representative with the group told The Center Square that the group may also sue the state over other legislation, which has to do with the safety of children online.
Latest News Stories
Illinois quick hits: Indiana House approves Bears stadium bill; Business, labor groups file petition to stop natural gas phaseout; Chicago woman gets 2 years for PPP fraud
Community violence intervention advocates tout crime reduction, taxpayer funding
Pritzker’s social media fee plan faces cost, legality questions
Chicago tourism rises; visitors ignore Trump’s condemnation
Illinois quick hits: Chicago man faces charges in road-rage shooting; migrant accused of murdering church volunteer; Illinois Liquor Control Commission launches new system
Executive Committee Advances “Project Northwinds”: 2,475 Jobs and $346 Million Investment Proposed for Former Caterpillar, Lion Electric Sites
Land Use Committee Advances Mokena Scrap Yard and Homer Glen Landscape Business Over Local Objections
Foxx to face questions about murder conviction review ‘investigations’
Planning Commission Backs 5-MW Peotone Solar Farm; Developer Pledges Pollinator Habitat and Community Funds
207U Committee Reviews Budget Adjustments, Facility Planning and Operations Issues
Joliet Junior College Board Approves $2 Tuition Increase Amidst Heated Debate Over Enrollment and Spending
207U Board Outlines Long-Term Planning Timeline, Reviews Academic and District Updates
207U Board Tables Activity Bus Lease After Cost, Timing Concerns