Green Garden Township Debates New Land Use Plan during Workshop, Pushes Potential Vote to October
Article Summary: The Green Garden Township Board reviewed a new draft Land Use Plan designed to protect the area’s rural character while defining commercial and industrial corridors for the first time. The board and the Planning Commission are now considering a public review process before an official vote, which is not expected until at least October due to public notice requirements.
Green Garden Township Board Key Points:
-
A 10-page draft Land Use Plan, created with consulting firm Housefield Lavine, was presented by the Plan Commission as an extract from the township’s larger comprehensive plan.
-
The plan includes a detailed map identifying specific corridors for commercial and industrial development, a feature absent from previous plans.
-
Procedural requirements, including a two-week public notice period for a Plan Commission vote, mean an official adoption of the plan is delayed until at least October.
-
Officials are debating whether to release the draft document to the public before a final vote to ensure resident feedback is incorporated.
GREEN GARDEN, IL — The Green Garden Township Board of Trustees reviewed a draft of a new, detailed Land Use Plan on Monday, a document aimed at guiding future development while preserving the township’s rural identity. Presented by the Plan Commission, the 10-page plan includes a specific map designating commercial and industrial corridors, but a final vote has been pushed to at least October to allow for proper public notice and board review.
Planning Commission Chairman Mark Sarkisian presented the document to the board, describing it as a “final draft, what we’re happy with.” He explained that the plan was developed with the consulting firm Housefield Lavine and was a multi-month effort that included community outreach through surveys, open houses, and focus groups.
“We extracted a land use plan from [the comprehensive plan],” Sarkisian said. “We’ve never had a land use plan in our comprehensive plan.” He noted the new document condenses a vague, half-paragraph mention of land use in the old plan into a focused, 10-page guide with a clear map. “It all culminates in a map,” he added. “We’ve identified the proposed commercial and industrial corridor instead of just having a sentence like we used to have before.”
Planning Commission members Lauren Piechuch and James Wayman took the lead on developing the map, leveraging their local knowledge.
While the board expressed appreciation for the commission’s extensive work, the discussion quickly turned to the next steps for approval. Because the Plan Commission must vote to formally recommend the plan to the board—a process requiring a two-week public notice in the newspaper—any action will be delayed. With Labor Day complicating the September schedule, a vote by the Plan Commission and subsequent vote by the Township Board will likely not occur until October.
A key point of discussion was whether to release the draft plan to the public before it is officially adopted. One attendee questioned how the public could provide meaningful comment at a future meeting if the document wasn’t available for review beforehand.
“How does the public give you comment before you vote on it if they don’t know what you’re voting on?” he asked.
Sarkisian expressed some hesitation, stating, “I personally don’t know that I want to put a draft version on.”
The board and commission ultimately decided that the township trustees would first review the document and provide feedback. Based on that input, the Plan Commission will determine the best way to present the plan to the public ahead of a formal vote, which could include posting it online or making it available for review at their next meeting.
The plan also attempts to address resident concerns about large-scale developments. In response to a question about protecting the township from solar farms and data centers, Sarkisian noted the plan is a proactive measure. He explained that the commission specifically disallowed higher-intensity industrial zoning classifications that would not align with the community’s vision. “It doesn’t fit in with our plan,” he said.
The Township Board will now digest the draft plan before the process moves forward in October.
Latest News Stories
Trump HHS tells states to remove gender ideology from sex ed or lose PREP funding
Americans could face ‘sticker shock’ as once-small tax exemption ends
‘Pro-taxpayer’ law requires operators to clean up abandoned Illinois oil wells
Black-only medical directory must open to all races after lawsuit
Embattled Fed governor sues Trump over ‘illegal’ firing
Watch: Cook County gun ban plaintiffs petition SCOTUS; Pritzker hasn’t heard from White House
Illinois quick hits: Man on pretrial release accused of murder; holiday weekend impaired driving patrols
GOP legislators propose creating new state from CA counties
Illinois quick hits: Gun ban challengers petition SCOTUS; man sentenced for COVID fraud
WATCH: Trump: Illinois’ ‘slob of a governor’ should call for help with public safety
WATCH: Legislator says Illinois’ child welfare agency uses interns, has legal exposure
Economic index shows reduced uncertainty, more stability in Midwest