207U School Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2025

Article Summary: The Peotone Board of Education rejected the district’s proposed 2025-2026 budget, which projected a $4.2 million deficit, forcing an emergency search for deep spending cuts. With the district having exhausted its borrowing capacity, the administration has been tasked with presenting three tiers of budget-cutting options before a new vote must be held by the state’s September 30 deadline.

Peotone CUSD 207U Budget Crisis Key Points:

• Budget Rejected: The board voted 4-3 against adopting the Fiscal Year 2026 budget, which carried a projected $4.2 million deficit.

• Financial Cliff: Administrators confirmed the district has run out of its capacity to borrow money, giving it approximately one year of financial solvency under the proposed spending plan.

• Cuts Demanded: The board directed the administration to draft three budget-cutting proposals: an aggressive plan, a moderate plan, and one with minimal student impact, to be reviewed before a new vote.

• Emergency Meeting: An emergency board meeting has been scheduled for the last week of September to pass a budget before the state’s September 30 deadline, after which the district would be legally unable to spend money.

PEOTONE, IL – The Peotone Board of Education on Monday, September 22, 2025, took the dramatic step of rejecting the district’s proposed 2025-2026 budget, signaling a full-blown financial crisis and triggering an urgent search for millions of dollars in spending cuts.

The budget, which projected a $4.2 million deficit, failed on a 4-3 vote during the regular board meeting. Board members who voted no—Tim Stoub, Ashley Stachniak, Jodi Becker, and Mark Jones II—pointed to the district’s dire financial state, which includes having completely exhausted its borrowing capacity.

The rejection forced a tense discussion in a committee meeting held immediately after, where the administration was directed to draft and present a series of drastic cutting options before an emergency meeting to pass a revised budget ahead of the state’s September 30 deadline.

“The fact that nothing changed in this proposed budget reflected where I voted today,” said Board Member Tim Stoub, explaining his opposition. He referenced a recent meeting where the district’s inability to borrow more money was fully revealed. “That changed a lot… Right now we’re dominoing over the edge.”

Business Manager Adrian Fulgencio and Superintendent Brandon Owens confirmed the severity of the situation. Under the proposed budget, the district has only one year of financial viability before its funds are depleted.

“4.2 million dollars is not something that we can just cut right here, right now, without it actually impacting students,” Fulgencio told the board.

In response, the board tasked the administration with finding ways to stretch the district’s finances for at least two years, providing a crucial window to plan for long-term solutions like school consolidation. “If you can start stretching from one year to two, that gets us into the range of consolidation,” Stoub said. “If we’re going to come to the community and ask for money to start building, ‘what have we done for them lately?’ is going to be the question. We spent money knowing that we ran out. That’s not going to land well.”

The administration is now preparing three proposals: an aggressive plan with major cuts that will significantly impact students; a moderate plan that could see cuts to extracurriculars in the range of $600,000 to $700,000; and a minimal-impact option, which administrators conceded would be difficult to achieve.

“I need the administration to recommend what our students today are going to feel the least and how can you make that number the highest,” Stoub said.

The crisis puts all district spending under a microscope, including capital projects like the proposed new baseball and softball fields, which were also discussed at the committee meeting. The path forward appears to hinge on a district-wide facility condition and feasibility study, which was presented by architectural firm Wight & Company. The study is intended to provide a roadmap for consolidating from five buildings to four or three, a move seen as essential for long-term financial stability.

The board must pass a budget by September 30 or it will be legally unable to spend money, which would halt payroll and vendor payments. An emergency meeting has been scheduled for Monday, September 29, to vote on a new, presumably leaner, budget.