Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Further Middle East unrest dominates tense delay of peace deal signing
Illinois Quick Hits: Economic development summit set for next week
California legislator accuses Newsom of violating state code
Op-Ed: What is the Declaration of Independence?
Illinois sees biggest drop in gas prices nationwide, still above $4 average
Democrats run against DeGette in Denver congressional race
Minnesota special districts report $5.4B debt, federal aid declines
Federal panel proposes new definition for sports betting
Illinois Venezuelans face economic ‘double whammy’
Ohio’s social media parental consent law allowed to go forward
HUD secretary discusses housing affordability during Michigan visit
Will County Land Bank Clears Committee With Two Amendments